Hi Steven, Steven M. Schultz wrote:
>On Wed, 15 Mar 2006, David Liontooth wrote: > > >>Way back in May of last year, Chris Wilkinson reported that x86_64 >>produced invalid wav files, and Steven M. Schultz replied the problem >>was likely solved already in CVS >> >> > Right - for the mjpegtools programs (lav2wav for example). I didn't > mean to imply that external programs or other projects had been > fixed on the x86_64 architecture ;) > > There were issues in mjpegtools that were fixed for x86_64 along with > a few general endian issues for big endian systems such as PPC. Those > were fixed. Didn't fix streamer because it's not in mjpegtools :) > > So just because the code is in a completely different package that has nothing to do with mjpegtools, that somehow frees you from responsibility??? (-- sorry, joking :-). I was imagining streamer used mjpegtools to create wav files, and I was obviously completely and embarrassingly wrong. The streamer tool was written by the grand master of v4l, Gerd Knorr <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, and is still maintained -- cf. http://cvs.bytesex.org/xawtv.html. I'll drop him a line. > mjpegtools works, lav2wav and others give valid headers and data the > last I checked. > > All I can claim in my defense is that it is difficult at times to track down which code does what. I feel much better already knowing mjpegtools do exactly what they're supposed to do on amd64. Dave ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Mjpeg-users mailing list Mjpeg-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users