On Fri, 9 Feb 2007 11:28:35 -0800 (PST) "Steven M. Schultz" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just another "it's easy to make wishes" posting - at least that's how > it looks to me. No links or pointers to information about ML-JPEG, > so we're not only supposed to design/create the codec but do all > the legwork/research too. According to http://groups.google.com/group/comp.compression/browse_thread/thread/d4d9b94abe3a48df/fa75a26216e7e452?#fa75a26216e7e452 it's some kind of differential MJPEG, storing I-frames and some kind ov B or P frames. I knew I should have implemented it (as in my thoughts, not ML-JPEG proper) for real when I experimented with it years ago. It's probably patented or something similarly ridiculous now. Pah. Or, hm, 2003... It (ML-JPEG) might have existed then (when I planned differential MJPEG). Pah again. /Sam ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Using Tomcat but need to do more? Need to support web services, security? Get stuff done quickly with pre-integrated technology to make your job easier. Download IBM WebSphere Application Server v.1.0.1 based on Apache Geronimo http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=120709&bid=263057&dat=121642 _______________________________________________ Mjpeg-users mailing list Mjpeg-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
