Stan Gammons wrote: > On Sat, 2008-12-06 at 14:45 +0100, Christian Ebert wrote: >> As far as I could see, no sudden spikes of quantization factor. >> At least with my testing material. > > I retrieved the CVS yesterday an processed a couple of previous captures > (raw DV, satellite source) using an ADVC-110. > > I "think" the previous version of mjpegtools I had was 1.9.0 RC1. I > compared the .m2v file size created with the previous version to the > file created with the CVS version. Old file (43542 frames) was > 1318530360. File with the CVS version is 1329509151. This is what I > typically use to process a capture edited with Kino: > > smil2yuv -i 2 -a file.wav file.smil | > y4mshift -b 8,0,704,476 | > y4mscaler -v 0 -I active=704x480+8+0 -O sar=src -O chromass=420_mpeg2 | > mpeg2enc -f 8 -D 10 -E -10 -4 1 -2 1 -c -q 3 -o file.m2v > mp2enc -o file.mp2 < file.wav > > I saw spike between 8 and 20 a few times as the output of mpeg2enc > scrolled by. After several hundred to 1,000 frames, it gets rather > boring to watch it scrol l by. > > The other capture I processed was twice as long or a perhaps a little > longer. After making a DVD of them, to me they looked Ok. So, I'd say > it's a lot better or perhaps "fixed" now. > > Thanks Andrew! >
So does this mean we're ready for new rc ?? sean ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SF.Net email is Sponsored by MIX09, March 18-20, 2009 in Las Vegas, Nevada. The future of the web can't happen without you. Join us at MIX09 to help pave the way to the Next Web now. Learn more and register at http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;208669438;13503038;i?http://2009.visitmix.com/ _______________________________________________ Mjpeg-users mailing list Mjpeg-users@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/mjpeg-users
