On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 10:33:01AM +0100, Mark Burton wrote:
>
> Further testing shows that you can get different output on subsequent
> runs on the same input (ignoring the time stamps).
>
> So far, all of the differences appear to be caused by data being output
> in a different order rather than the data itself being different. So, I
> believe that the resulting maps are still good. You should understand
> that the ordering of some of the map's data structures is not important
> as long as all the cross-references match up.
Has anyone written a "lint" program for *.img files that would validate
all the cross-references? Or a program to pretty-print the data structures
in sorted format? The sorted pretty-print should be identical across runs.
Marko
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
