On Jun 1, 2009, at 8:41 PM, gyp...@gmx.eu wrote:
I think, streets and pedestrian squares need to be linked to allow
routing. If there is no link, we should assume that this is intended
as there is no connection reality. The more OSM related routings
systems are being used, the more people will see to edit their data
more precisely.
I agree with this, and think this is most likely the best way to
handle this. I have noticed, for example, that there are several
pedestrian areas which are completely surrounded by buildings. Trying
to create connecting ways could result in ways that go through
buildings or other impassible objects. Therefore, as you suggest, we
can only rely on existing links to the squares.
This has the side-effect of making the coding much easier. ;-)
Does anyone know how the other OSM routing programs (such as
travelling salesman, etc.) solve this? (If at all)
I didn't try it with TS yet, but www.openrouteservice.org leads you
along the borders of pedestrian areas. This seems to be not the best
solution but a practicable one.
This is also the same way that routing with my patch will work
(provided there are linking ways), so at least that is consistent.
Thanks for your comments. Cheers.
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
