Marco, Does this work as a relation?
> #boundaries > > boundary=administrative & admin_level<3 [0x1e resolution 14] > boundary=administrative & admin_level<5 [0x1d resolution 16] > boundary=administrative & admin_level<7 [0x1d resolution 20] > boundary=administrative [0x1c resolution 22] > boundary=political [0x1c resolution 22] > boundary=national [0x1e resolution 14] > > It looks nice for Italy. > > Ciao, Marco. > >> >> On 8/3/09, Lambertus <o...@na1400.info> >> wrote: >> > It appears that very low level administrative >> boundaries are rendered >> > quite prominently using the default Mkgmap style. An >> example is shown >> > here: http://forum.openstreetmap.org/viewtopic.php?pid=31404#p31404 >> > >> > What are the options to reduce the visibility of those >> boundaries? >> > _______________________________________________ >> > mkgmap-dev mailing list >> > mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk >> > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev >> > >> >> >> -- >> cheers, >> maning >> ------------------------------------------------------ >> "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden >> wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ >> blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ >> ------------------------------------------------------ >> _______________________________________________ >> mkgmap-dev mailing list >> mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk >> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev >> > > > > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > -- cheers, maning ------------------------------------------------------ "Freedom is still the most radical idea of all" -N.Branden wiki: http://esambale.wikispaces.com/ blog: http://epsg4253.wordpress.com/ ------------------------------------------------------ _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev