Hi, Mark Burton schreef: >> However, if there's no access restriction for cyclists, there's no real >> need to build an extra way here - or is there? > You have a point. Of course, an access restriction could be added later > by the style rules but that's pretty unlikely?
I'm not sure altogether. The thing is, I myself wouldn't tag a road with the combination "bicycle=no/cycleway=lane", as this feels wrong. (You can't have a bike lane on a road that allows no bikes, as the lane is part of the very road). But that doesn't mean it's not possible. I simply don't know. So actually, for me, the opposite cycleways are enough and I simply should use that option. I'm not sure what the other option could do. If others find it useful - leave it as is. Best regards, Valentijn _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
