On 17.01.2010 11:20, Marko Mäkelä wrote:
Hi Felix,
Thank you for testing my patch. In any case, I will try to figure out
what caused the size difference for me. Even if the patch does not seem
to bring much CPU-wise, the compact notation could be useful in some cases.
But as your example shows, the downside of the compactness would be extra
care needed when editing rules:
On Sun, Jan 17, 2010 at 12:18:07AM +0100, Felix Hartmann wrote:
I lost all of the following
new:
place ~ 'town\|suburb\village' [0x03 resolution 21]
old:
place=suburb | place=town | place=village [0x03 resolution 21]
It should be suburb\|village, not suburb\village. You should have got
points for place=town, but there probably were no place="suburb\village"
in the input. :-) (I don't even know what the \v would translate into
in this case. Probably just 'v', but it could be 0x0b (vertical tab) too.
Well however even without typo I'm still missing them!!!!!
Using:
/landuse ~ 'residential\|residental' [0x03 resolution 21]
place ~ 'town\|suburb\|village\|hamlet' [0x03 resolution 21]/
There is absolutely no 0x03 in my map....
If I use instead
/landuse=residential | landuse=residental [0x03 resolution 21]
place=suburb | place=village | place=town [0x03 resolution 21]/
it renders fine.
Something fundamentally fucks up in with your patch or there is again
some typo that I made?
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
