Felix,

> Doesn't sound right to me. There is no need for 0x4b at all (my maps do 
> not contain 0x4b). The only thing that I could imagine that happenend 
> based on your above description is that both sea and land were at the 
> same level, or that the polygon for land was not correctly set. Try 
> using maptk for Typfiles, ati.land makes too many errors.
> There is definitely neither a need to have 0x4b inside typfile, or map.

Sea and land were not at the same level but I wonder if because the sea
poly ended up on level 1 when I removed the 0x4b poly, it had some odd
effect.

So, tell me, do you have any polys at a higher priority than your sea
poly or is the sea poly on level 1?

Mark
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

Reply via email to