El 10/08/10 15:12, Marko Mäkelä escribió:
> On Tue, Aug 10, 2010 at 02:37:42PM +0200, Valentijn Sessink wrote:
>
>> Marko Mäkelä schreef:
>>
>>> I am planning to remove the { add bicycle=no; add foot=no } from
>>> highway=trunk and to restore non-bicycle paths to road_speed=0.
>>>
>> I'd suggest you don't. I do not know why bicycle routing differs.
>> Adding random patches to my random reports won't help.
>>
> It is not totally random. Someone just yelled that defaulting bicycle=no
> on highway=trunk is not right, and I cannot disagree with that. If there
> is no traffic sign that prohibits bicycles and pedestrians, then they
> are allowed. And I haven't seen such traffic signs in Finland, except in
> some places when there is a cycleway next to the highway=trunk.
Just to add information from some other place, in Spain trunk roads are
allowed for bicycles and pedestrians; only motorways are forbidden for
them. So +1 to remove the { add bicycle=no; add foot=no } from me too.
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
