Marko Mäkelä <marko.mak...@iki.fi> wrote: > On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 07:08:50PM +0100, Johannes Formann wrote: > >> Unrelated to this mkgmap bug (or insufficient diagnostics), is there > >> a reason why you are still using the osm.bz2 input? The osm.pbf is > >> more compact and can be split quicker. > > > >Just tried it again, but got an exception: > > As far as I understand, the osm.pbf input support is still not in the > splitter trunk archive. It is in > https://svn.mkgmap.org.uk/svn/splitter/branches/crosby_integration but > unfortunately not all dependencies are included. I use the package that > Steve created: http://files.mkgmap.org.uk/download/6/splitter-r161.zip
I just tested that version of the splitter without contourdata, and it seams to run without obvious problems like before. (Except one/two smaller one, but I'll think they are style related) So I'll have to take a look at the contourdata, they are "inherited" and were created before srtm2osm was avaiable. (perhaps creating new one might be the easiest solution). greetings Johannes _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev