Hello there,

first i want to say great work with the new versions of splitter and mkgmap!

In the moment i'm using mkgmap r2412 in conjunction with splitter r263 and
encounter a problem:

Formerly i used the following tool chain:
1) data.pbf -> splitter -> tiles.pbf -> mkgmap -> gmapsupp.img
(2.067.628.032 bytes)

Then i used o5m for input to splitter to speed things up with the same
result:
2) data-o5m -> splitter -> tiles.pbf -> mkgmap -> gmapsupp.img
(2.067.628.032 bytes)

Last night i tried o5m also for intermediary format to further speed up
things:
3) data-o5m -> splitter -> tiles.o5m -> mkgmap -> gmapsupp.img
(1.612.251.136 bytes)
and a lot of detail is missing?

What am i doing wrong, do i miss something?
>From 2) to 3) i only changed --output=pbf to --output=o5m, nothing else?

Kind regards, Uli



--
View this message in context: 
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Commit-r2412-merge-the-o5m-support-branch-tp5740691p5740796.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://lists.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

Reply via email to