Hi Gerd,
maybe later this week. I am quite sure that there is no fundamental
difference. I compared two files with JOSM and did not find any visual diff.
WanMil
Hi WanMil,
I was not yet able to change the PrecompSea* code so that it generates
identical output in two runs, so I still can't say for sure
that the differences in the output can be ignored :-(
Maybe you have an idea?
Gerd
GerdP wrote
Good hint :-)
I'll try that tomorrow.
Gerd
Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2014 21:03:05 +0100
From:
wmgcnfg@
To:
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Commit: r2982: performance improvement: use
Path2D.append() followed by one
> P.S.: I noticed that the sea files have a slightly different size
with
> r2981 and r2982. I guess that's because of different id's used for
nodes
> and ways?
yes, I noticed that, too, but found no difference in the data in JOSM.
Maybe I write a tool to renumber the nodes and ways and order them
somehow
so that it is easier to compare.
Gerd
Running with one thread should give the same results? That might be
easier that writing a separate tool.
WanMil
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
--
View this message in context:
http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Commit-r2982-performance-improvement-use-Path2D-append-followed-by-one-tp5794237p5794437.html
Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
