Hi Steve,

the problem is caused by this way:
http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/97056983

It is only a few meters long but contains 722 points.
For each point your style creates a POI, and that is simply too much for a small
area (because you use --add-pois-to-ways and your style
doesn't check the mkgmap:line2poitype tag)

I'll try to fix the problem in the program code, I think we should
be able to filter the duplicates.

Gerd


Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 23:36:06 +1000
From: steve.sgalow...@gmail.com
To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] ontario canada maps




On Tue, Mar 4, 2014 at 11:29 PM, Gerd Petermann 
<gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com> wrote:




Hi Stephen,

please post a link to your style files, so that we can
reproduce the problem.

Gerd

Date: Tue, 4 Mar 2014 22:43:12 +1000
From: steve.sgalow...@gmail.com

To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] ontario canada maps

now i get point file to big 

max nodes = 160,000 
any ideas ?


On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 8:27 PM, Steve Sgalowski <steve.sgalow...@gmail.com> 
wrote:


i was thinking , maybe if i download another pre compiled map of the area then 
used gmap tool to de compile into a typ file 


do you think this could partly solve my prob ?

stephen 


On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 7:26 PM, Gerd Petermann 
<gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com> wrote:






Hi Stephen,

I guess it is something special in your style, I can't reproduce the problem 
with the default style.

The values 90.000 / 160.000 are extreme small, so the problem seems to be that 
a very small



area contains a large number of POI. I saw a similar problem a few weeks ago 
with a 
style that assigned POI to zip codes and buildings which contained hundrets of 
PO-boxes with different
zip codes.

Gerd




Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 19:21:50 +1000
From: steve.sgalow...@gmail.com
To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk



Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] ontario canada maps

due to the number of points in the map 
however , i have not had many issues with the other maps i create 
with the same program 


i have r3072 , and splitter 317 installed 




On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 7:18 PM, Gerd Petermann 
<gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com> wrote:







Hi Steve,

you used 90.000, why do you think that 160.000 will help?

Gerd

Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 19:13:46 +1000

From: steve.sgalow...@gmail.com
To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] ontario canada maps





running it now with 160,000 nodes and here is the basic args file 


On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Gerd Petermann 
<gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com> wrote:








Hi Stephen,

sorry, forget my last post, order of args doesn't seem to matter in splitter.
I was not able to reproduce the problem with the default style, mkgmap
r3072 (trunk) and splitter r317.





I used max-nodes=1600000 and see no problem.

So, please make sure that you use the latest versions of the programs 
and if that doesn't help, please send more details regarding the content
of ..\bin\template_basic.args






Gerd


Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 18:28:21 +1000
From: steve.sgalow...@gmail.com
To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk





Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] ontario canada maps

here is the batch file i use 

On Sun, Mar 2, 2014 at 6:16 PM, Gerd Petermann 
<gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com> wrote:









Hi Stephen,

is the OSM file the only input? Or do you mix it with something else?

Gerd

Date: Sun, 2 Mar 2014 18:13:03 +1000
From: steve.sgalow...@gmail.com






To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
Subject: [mkgmap-dev] ontario canada maps

while the splitter worked ok the compiler has spat the dummy 






error msg is this 
area  to small to split reduce point number then i get , (  point number to big)

--max-areas - 100 --max-nodes = 90000
any ideas?
stephen 


_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev                            
          

_______________________________________________

mkgmap-dev mailing list

mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk

http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev



_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev                            
          

_______________________________________________

mkgmap-dev mailing list

mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk

http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev



_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev                            
          

_______________________________________________

mkgmap-dev mailing list

mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk

http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev



_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev                            
          

_______________________________________________

mkgmap-dev mailing list

mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk

http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev





_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev                            
          

_______________________________________________

mkgmap-dev mailing list

mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk

http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev



_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev                            
          
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

Reply via email to