It would make it easier for someone (a moped rider?) who wanted to make
a special-purpose map for routing on his moped. The point I would like
to make, is that once you have a central place for "country specific
rules" (some may say "country defaults" but that may be a dangerous term
to use in the OSM) there are many other ways that it can be sensibly
used. Indeed, we already have the address handling, and I have phone
number handling (which I posted about a few months back). 

I am just thinking a bit like an architect - "it's what I do" - a simple
change which enables a wide variety of functions, even ones which
haven't been thought of yet. The current include files are divided first
by function ("address", "roadspeed" etc) and then sometimes internally
by country. Listening to myself for a minute it sounds like I am
advocating inverting that structure. I am probably a bit late to the
party with profound ideas like that! 

Anyway thanks for a wonderful program and keep up the great work! 

Colin 

On 2014-04-18 13:16, WanMil wrote: 

> Hi Colin,
> 
>> Another couple of examples of country defaults for NLD: cycleway: add 
>> mofa=yes; add moped=no
> 
> mofa and moped are not supported with the default style so it makes no sense 
> to add those rules.
> 
>> motorway/link: add bicycle=no; add mofa=no; add moped=no; add foot=no; add 
>> agricultural=no; add maxspeed=130;
> 
> agricultural is also not supported int the default style. Adding maxspeed in 
> the access rules is not appropriate. It should be done in the roadspeed 
> include.
> 
>> Would it be more manageable to have a directory structure containing a small 
>> file per country, which is loaded (cached) on first use? Then we won't have 
>> to merge so many changes into the one big file as the usage of this facility 
>> spreads across the globe.
> 
> It's the same thing with the address include which exists since a long time. 
> Anyhow the country specifc rule are not so numerous so that I think it's not 
> worthy to create country specific include files.
> 
> WanMil
> Colin On 2014-04-18 12:37, Minko wrote: Wanmil, here are two examples of 
> country specific rules. Maybe put them in one inc/access_country file so 
> anyone can add their speific country rules to this file? # The Netherlands 
> highway=trunk & mkgmap:country=NLD { add bicycle=no; add foot=no } 
> highway=cycleway & mkgmap:country=NLD { add foot=yes } highway=bridleway & 
> mkgmap:country=NLD { add foot=yes } # Belgium highway=trunk & 
> mkgmap:country=BEL { add bicycle=no; add foot=no } highway=cycleway & 
> mkgmap:country=BEL { add foot=yes } highway=bridleway & mkgmap:country=BEL { 
> add foot=yes } _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev 
> mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk 
> <mailto:mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> 
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev [1] 
> _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list 
> mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk 
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev [1]

_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev [1]

 

Links:
------
[1] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

Reply via email to