Well, I think using nonroutable lines for routable types broke the
address search (you tried to get somewhere that didn't exist for routing
or so...). But I'm not sure what it was about exactly. I think it broke
something because I remember I used 0x00 and 0x01 unroutable long time
ago and stopped using it..
On the other hand, if 0x15 is routable without problems now, could this
be true for all types? - Assuming the nonroutable types are actually
routable, just mkgmap cannot create them routable???
On 02.05.2014 14:59, Gerd Petermann wrote:
Hi Felix,
on the other hand, the test that prints the messages below may also be
out-dated.
I am no longer sure that the use of routable types for non-routable
lines really breaks
routing. I'll have to search the archives to find out why I've coded
that test.
Gerd
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 14:56:10 +0200
From: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] strange routing
I know that a long time ago I tried 0x15 - and it would not route on
my Vista HCx - but mind - that's a long time ago. Never tried id since...
On 02.05.2014 14:54, Gerd Petermann wrote:
Hi Minko,
yes, MapSource uses type 0x15 for routing.
When I add it to the list of routable types --check-styles
complains about other lines in your style:
Warning: routable type 0x15 is used for non-routable line with
level 0. This may break routing. Style file lines, line 296
Warning: routable type 0x15 is used for non-routable line with
level 0. This may break routing. Style file lines, line 297
Warning: routable type 0x15 is used for non-routable line with
level 0. This may break routing. Style file lines, line 298
Warning: routable type 0x15 is used for non-routable line with
level 0. This may break routing. Style file lines, line 299
Warning: routable type 0x15 is used for non-routable line with
level 0. This may break routing. Style file lines, line 341
Warning: routable type 0x15 is used for non-routable line with
level 0. This may break routing. Style file lines, line 342
Warning: routable type 0x15 is used for non-routable line with
level 0. This may break routing. Style file lines, line 345
So I am not sure if I should simply commit that.
Does anybody else use type 0x15 for lines?
Gerd
> Date: Fri, 2 May 2014 13:12:15 +0200
> From: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
> To: [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] strange routing
>
> Hi Gerd
> Yes, seems 0x15 is routable.
>
>
> > forgot to mention that --check-styles complains about line 266
in the
> > lines file:
> > highway=bridleway & bicycle!=yes & bicycle!=designated &
> > bicycleroute!=yes & mtb_from_relation!=yes & mtb!=yes {add
access =
> > no; add foot = yes; set mkgmap:unpaved=1} [0x2915 road_class=0
> > road_speed=0 resolution 23]
> >
> > Type 0x2915 is in the overlays file :
> > 0x2915: 0x15, 0x29
> >
> > Do you think type 0x15 is routable?
> >
> > Gerd
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
<mailto:[email protected]>
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
--
keep on biking and discovering new trails
Felix
openmtbmap.org &www.velomap.org <http://www.velomap.org>
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing
list [email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
--
keep on biking and discovering new trails
Felix
openmtbmap.org & www.velomap.org
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
