Hi Steve, I played a little bit with display tool r435. I was not able to display the label in inkSkape. Is there a trick?
I noticed that my Garmin maps have a rather small avg. number of elements compared to those produced by mkgmap. Up to now I found no simple rule reg. the area size of a sub div and the contained elements. Gerd > Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2014 14:11:29 +0000 > From: [email protected] > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Optimizing MapSplitter > > > Hi Gerd > > As you've probably seen I've added the program to the display svn > as test.svg.subdiv.Main. There is an argument '--level N' to display > a different zoom level. Default is 0 (most detailed). > > I've found that our OSM maps seem to have a lot more elements than > other maps so it is difficult to compare. > In general the way we create subdivisions means that many of them > are quite large and they contain many elements. There are no > small divisions. > > > > > If I got it right, the redraw time is influenced by > > a) how many sub divisions are overlapping a given bbox and > > b) how many objects are in these sub divisions and > > c) how complex the objects are (means, how much time it takes to render > > them) > > It is also possible that the way that the divisions on different > levels link together may have an effect, as it may be able to > restrict the number of divisions it has to consider. > > ..Steve > > > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list [email protected] http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
