Hi Bernd, thanks for testing. I am esp. interested in all special cases, so I am going to add more code to verify the results next week.
Typical problem cases which are probably not handled well: - long unnamed service roads leading to multiple addresses - long roads connecting two or more villages. Often, numbering starts with 1 in each village, this leads to a lot of messages. - in small villages, I often see addr:street=<village-name> and many streets with name=<village-name>, but also a primary road road without a street name, e.g. B213. Houses close to this primary road are probably accessible from the primary road, but address search will not show that. I am not sure if that should be fixed in OSM or not. If you find other typical cases, please let me know. Gerd Bernd Weigelt wrote > Am Donnerstag, 19. Februar 2015, 20:15:08 schrieb Stéphane MARTIN: >> Thank you Gerd ! > > Tested with r3471, seems to work ok, will test over the next days. > > Bernd > > -- > amarok2 now playing: > artist: The BossHoss > title: My Favorite Game > album: Rodeo Radio > > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev@.org > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/r3469-in-housenumber2-branch-tp5834295p5834368.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev