Hi Gerd,
> I agree that it looks strange,
> but it works when you use apply like this:
> type=multipolygon & highway=* { apply { set area=yes; } }As I understand "apply" deals with relation's members, which aren't highways at all. I have already tried "apply" but this is simply wrong approach.
> You may also ask for mkgmap:mp_created=true in the rules.Does it mean that polyline is created form multipolygon and nothing else? I get about 600 objects in Poland which I would delete using this rule. All looks like good candidates for removal. And probably I should use complimentary rule in "polygons" file, to get proper support for these objects. Looks good for temporary solution.
> I can't reproduce that the lines rules are applied, > with my test file that contains the complete relation > only the polygon rules are used. I assume your input > file contains only a part of the relation?See attached file with single relation. I get highway=footway as polyline. Here result of echotags:
relation with added "area=yes" in style: 4764899 - [highway=footway,area=yes,type=multipolygon] highway in "lines"4611686018427387910 (4764899) - [highway=footway,mkgmap:mp_created=true,mkgmap:stylefilter=polyline]
Maybe you could create a new relation in MultiPolygonRelation.processElements()? Relation could include all tags form original relation and new polylines as members. This would allow for some processing in style.
Note: default style deals with "highway=pedestrian & area=yes", but ignore "area" tag for most other types of highway. I think at least footway and stairs should be checked for "area".
-- Best regards, Andrzej
multi-hw.7z
Description: Binary data
_______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
