Hi Alexandre,

I think the problem here is that you have two ways named "RUA PORTO ALEGRE",
one with id 2, the other with id 46, and both are in the same city.
So far no problem, but the addr:interpolation ways on those two roads
also produce a bunch of duplicate numbers. 
As a result, the new algo decides to ignore them.
Unfortunately, the log 
FEIN: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.housenumber.HousenumberGenerator  
e:\testdata\03205200-vila_velha.osm: keeping duplicate numbers assigned to 
different roads in cluster  RUA PORTO ALEGRE 2(0) 2(1)
FEIN: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.housenumber.HousenumberGenerator  
e:\testdata\03205200-vila_velha.osm: keeping duplicate numbers assigned to 
different roads in cluster  RUA PORTO ALEGRE 3(0) 3(1)
FEIN: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.housenumber.HousenumberIvl  
e:\testdata\03205200-vila_velha.osm: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/13 
800..2, step=2 generated even interpolated number(s) for id=2, RUA PORTO ALEGRE
FEIN: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.housenumber.HousenumberIvl  
e:\testdata\03205200-vila_velha.osm: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/14 
801..3, step=2 generated odd interpolated number(s) for id=2, RUA PORTO ALEGRE
FEIN: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.housenumber.HousenumberIvl  
e:\testdata\03205200-vila_velha.osm: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/65 
419..205, step=2 generated odd interpolated number(s) for id=46, RUA PORTO 
ALEGRE
FEIN: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.housenumber.HousenumberIvl  
e:\testdata\03205200-vila_velha.osm: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/65 
203..3, step=2 generated odd interpolated number(s) for id=46, RUA PORTO ALEGRE
FEIN: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.housenumber.HousenumberIvl  
e:\testdata\03205200-vila_velha.osm: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/66 
418..204, step=2 generated even interpolated number(s) for id=46, RUA PORTO 
ALEGRE
FEIN: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.housenumber.HousenumberIvl  
e:\testdata\03205200-vila_velha.osm: http://www.openstreetmap.org/way/66 
202..2, step=2 generated even interpolated number(s) for id=46, RUA PORTO ALEGRE
FEIN: uk.me.parabola.mkgmap.osmstyle.housenumber.HousenumberGenerator  
e:\testdata\03205200-vila_velha.osm: found problems with interpolated numbers 
from addr:interpolations ways for roads with name RUA PORTO ALEGRE


is not very clear about the reason and the final action, but I think the data 
is not okay and the algo is correct
to ignore it.

What do you think?
Gerd

Date: Wed, 17 Jun 2015 15:28:04 -0300
From: alexandre.l...@gmail.com
To: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
CC: adm_tec_tracksou...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Numbering loss in the version which came after the    
r3602

Hi Andrzej,
Ok, thank you for your time and analyses.Lets wait for Gerd.

regards,Alexandre

2015-06-17 13:13 GMT-03:00 Andrzej Popowski <po...@poczta.onet.pl>:
Hi Alexandre,



I confirm, that there is no address on your map with current mkgmap. Data seems 
to be OK, so lets wait for Gerd opinion.



-- 

Best regards,

Andrzej

_______________________________________________

mkgmap-dev mailing list

mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk

http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev




_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev                            
          
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

Reply via email to