Hi Felix,

reg. the idea of "cutting out overlaps": I guess it would consume quite a lot 
of CPU and it would heavily increase the img size

because we would have to write many more points. Think of a shape for 
"place=village" with hundreds of holes for each building

shape. Up to now we save the shape for the village and the shapes for the 
buildings. With cutting we have to calculate what

remains of the village shape, this would be a very complex shape with many 
holes, so it would have many points.

I don't think that would be a good idea.


reg. sorting by size: I've not noticed any visible change in Basecamp or on my 
Oregon, so I don't think this is a solution.


I looked at maps produced by Garmin and 1st got the impression that they are 
sorted by type, highest types coming first,

but I also found exceptions. Don't know if this means that the order is not 
important or if there is a complex rules behind this.


Gerd

________________________________
Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Felix 
Hartmann <extremecar...@gmail.com>
Gesendet: Sonntag, 24. Juli 2016 21:40:47
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Option to output polygons in size order

That is not really a good approach. Basecamp orders the polygons opposite to 
most gps devices. So it will still be broken.


There is however a proper way to do - but that would be much much more 
complicated: Create a list of polygons that may not overlap (in the 
style-file). Then if mkgmap finds that 2 of these polygons do overlap - mkgmap 
should cut out the smaller polygon shape from the bigger. Basically the result 
of that approach would mimic how a Mapnik map looks in this case. Still the 
real solution however would be to fix the underlying OSM data. I have no clue 
how code and time intensive the "mimic Mapnik" approach would be, but 
everything else won't really solve much.

On 24 July 2016 at 20:42, Gerd Petermann 
<gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com<mailto:gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com>> wrote:

Hi Ticker,


with the current algo the order is either "unpredictable" or

the order in the input file (osm.pbf is typically sorted by id).

This depends on the --preserve-element-order

If I see this right this order will have an influence on the result

of the so-called shape merger which tries to combine shapes

with similar attributes.

I still don't understand why the size should matter, but it should

be easy to add a sort after the line

shapes = mergedShapes;

in MapBuilder.java


I don't have the time today, so try on your own or wait a little

for a patch .



________________________________
Von: mkgmap-dev 
<mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk>>
 im Auftrag von Ticker Berkin 
<rwb-mkg...@jagit.co.uk<mailto:rwb-mkg...@jagit.co.uk>>
Gesendet: Sonntag, 24. Juli 2016 20:23:41
An: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk>
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Option to output polygons in size order

Hi Gerd

Looking at the meaning of the sub-division, this looks like just the
place to try and order the polygons by size! What governs the order
they appear in at the moment? The size should be the full size of the
individual polygon.

Concerning the new thread "Why do we render place=island polygons in
the default style", I have used "place=island & size_of() < 1000000" to
get around the major problem but it seemed a bit arbitrary, and when I
found other examples where, just sometimes, large polygons mask all
features within I thought there must be a more general solution

Ticker

On Sun, 2016-07-24 at 00:05 -0700<tel:05%20-0700>, Gerd Petermann wrote:
> Hi Ticker,
>
> Ticker Berkin wrote
> > I'd understood and hoped that, for areas with the same level it
> > rendered areas in file order, and I see on my device it
> > overwriting,
> > sometimes woods with island, sometimes the other way around,
> > depending
> > on, I presumed, the input ordering. I see the exactly the same
> > overwriting effect zooming in or scrolling in any direction.
> >
> > What is the scale of the 'sub areas' you mention?
>
> I should have said sub division , and they have no specific scale.
> They are used to group nearby elements, and they have several limits
> like "not more than 255 points and not more than 255 lines in one sub
> div"
> For details see first the imgformat-1.0.pdf from Mechalas:
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/garmin-img/files/OldFiles/imgformat.p
> df/download
> Other sources:
> http://wiki.openstreetmap.org/wiki/OSM_Map_On_Garmin/IMG_File_Format
> (which has more links at the end)
>
> Reg. the British Islands polygon: If I got that right this is the
> very complex mp-relation
> https://www.openstreetmap.org/relation/6038068
> (don't use the link, the thing is too complex)
> It was added 2016-03-09 so maybe the problem is rather new and nobody
> noticed it. I think it makes no sense to render that polygon, the
> rules
> in the default style should be changed to check the
> area_size() for place=island so that large polygons are ignored.
> I'll try to find a reasonable value.
>
> Gerd
>
>
>
>
>
>
> --
> View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n5.nabble.com/Option-t
> o-output-polygons-in-size-order-tp5878989p5879011.html
> Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk>
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk>
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk<mailto:mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk>
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev



--
Felix Hartman - Openmtbmap.org & VeloMap.org
Schusterbergweg 32/8
6020 Innsbruck
Austria - ?sterreich
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

Reply via email to