Hi Ticker, merging earlier seems to require quite heavy changes, so I gave up.
Gerd ________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Gerd Petermann <gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com> Gesendet: Montag, 23. Januar 2017 11:01:11 An: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] new branch split-shape Hi Ticker, Ticker Berkin wrote > What aspect of sea polygons is getting worse? GPSMapEdit reports that the shapes require more memory, I think that means that --order-by-decreasing-area option still creates more shapes. Same problem with background shapes (0x4B). A quick work around might be to place those large polygons into their own sub divs. I am experimenting with this idea and with an earlier shape merge. Ticker Berkin wrote > Once the new algo is shown not to cause problems: for quick/simple > wins, I'd like to convert PolygonSplitter*, AreaClipper and > MultiPolygonRelation to use the new code. OK, go ahead. Gerd -- View this message in context: http://gis.19327.n8.nabble.com/new-branch-split-shape-tp5889303p5889811.html Sent from the Mkgmap Development mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
