Hi Patrik
Folder structure looks the same as with for example jmc_cli.
I'm sorry but I still do not understand the problem.
If you create a map normally and then convert it with the garmin
converter does that gmapi map work?
The same map converted with mkgmap --gmapi, you are saying does
not work.
So if the first one works, but the second doesn't, then there must be
a difference between the two maps.
The only differences I know of are:
1. We do not create the top level osmmap.gmapi directory.
2. There are differences in the white space in the Info.xml file.
Or there is a difference in your case that I am not aware of.
If the problem is the first, then it is easy enough to fix.
I can't believe that it is the second, but you never know..
If there is another difference I need to know what it is.
If you could create a small map that does not work that you
could upload that would be helpful.
..Steve
It doesn't make a difference if I call mkgmap --gmapsupp with the
overview parameters (--overview-mapname=... --overview-mapnumber=...),
in no case I have overview maps.
The only difference is how the files are named inside the gmap directory
structure, either with the choosen names or with the default names.
Below shown call of mkgmap is the version without overview options...
Cheers
Patrik
On 06.02.2017 23:33, Steve Ratcliffe wrote:
Hi Patrik
I've just noticed that the quite new option --gmapi does not work
properly regarding overview maps:
- I first build the img files where all is correct, overview maps are
properly built and set at the different needed locations (*.tdb file,
elsewhere ?)
- running mkgmap with the option --gmapi (complete output shown below)
causes that the overview maps are not anymore shown in BaseCamp
How does the gmapi map differ from one created using the script or
Garmin's conversion tool?
BTW: Something similar happens probably with --gmapsupp: there are now
overview maps visible on the GPS itself.
The gmapsupp does not contain a base map. I suppose if you actually
included it on the command line then it would be added, but you should
not do that.
..Steve
Here the call of mkgmap and its output:
java -Xmx1536M -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -jar
D:/fzk/develop/fzk-mde-garmin/Freizeitkarte-Entwicklung/tools/mkgmap/mkgmap.jar
--max-jobs=2 --index --code-page=1252 --gmapi
--license-file=Freizeitkarte_LUX.license --product-id=1
--family-id=6442 --family-name="Freizeitkarte_LUX"
--series-name="Freizeitkarte_LUX" --description="Freizeitkarte_LUX
(Release 17.02)" --product-version="6442" 6442*.img 6442.TYP
--tdbfile --show-profiles=1
Time started: Sun Feb 05 16:10:10 CET 2017
Number of MapFailedExceptions: 0
Number of ExitExceptions: 0
Time finished: Sun Feb 05 16:10:12 CET 2017
Total time taken: 1858ms
Am I doing something wrong or is this a 'defect' in the newly
implemented gmapi option ?
Thanks for helping
Patrik
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
