I would interpret that the other way round. If surface=paved, concrete,
... treat it as paved, no matter what tracktype is. I think tracktype is
very often misinterpreted by mappers, and wiki doesn't clarify it much
either. Additionally, tracktype>1 may be an old tag placed before track
was paved, in the same way that you can find a lot of
highway=residential, tertiary, etc + tracktype=*
El 09/02/17 a las 11:25, lig fietser escribió:
My OFM will mark them as unpaved. The combination of track and grade3
counts more than the surface. I think the current default rules assign
them also as unpaved. Your patch v3 too, is that correct?
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Gerd wrote:
And what about combinations of surface meaning paved with tracktype?
The wiki says "Usually ... " or "Almost always an unpaved track" for most
tracktype values.
I see quite a lot of ways with
highway=track & surface=concrete:lanes & tracktype=grade3
in my Niedersachsen:
http://overpass-turbo.eu/s/lNI
I think those are not unpaved, no matter how nice it is to cycle on
them;-)
Gerd
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
