Hi Gerd,
my idea was more simple, than your implementation. I just would like to
create multiple map objects with single rule. I didn't put "continue"
there, because I assumed, that all element type definition should be
processed.
Still "continue" could be applied, it would mean, that OSM object is
processed further, possibly resulting in 3-rd map object or more. I
think "continue" or "continue with_actions" could be added to last type
definition.
Any other more complicated rules, like adding actions after first type
definition, could be written just like now, with multiple statements.
While I appreciate more flexibility I'm afraid, it could clutter the style.
--
Best regards,
Andrzej
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
