Hi Nick,

I also wondered why Garmin prefers 3312 while 3314 looks the exacter value.
Found no explanation so far.

Gerd

________________________________________
Von: mkgmap-dev <[email protected]> im Auftrag von 
osm@pinns <[email protected]>
Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2018 15:04:32
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] option --show-profiles and DEM

Hi Gerd

should 3312 logically  be 3314 (2^32/(360*3600))  ?

Not that it matters much.

r

Nick


On 11/01/2018 13:48, Gerd Petermann wrote:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> you are right, thanks for the hint. I took those from the transalpin demo 
> map, but the last two levels are empty.
> So, r4045 now says
>          Example which should work with levels="0:24, 1:22, 2:20, 3:18":
>          --dem-dists=3312,13248,26512,53024
>
> Gerd
>
> ________________________________________
> Von: mkgmap-dev <[email protected]> im Auftrag von 
> [email protected] 
> <[email protected]>
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2018 14:38:24
> An: Development list for mkgmap
> Betreff: [mkgmap-dev]  option --show-profiles and DEM
>
> Hi Gerd,
>
> I got a bit confused when I read  the doc/example
>
> --dem-dists=number[,number]
> If given, the option specifies the resolution(s) or zoom level for the DEM 
> data. If not given, mkgmap tries to determine a reasonable value based on the 
> resolution found in the *.hgt files. For PC programs like MapSource or 
> Basecamp you only need one zoom level, for gps devies you need one for each 
> resolution given with the --levels option. The actual values are given as 
> distance between two DEM points. Higher disances mean lower resolution and 
> thus fewer bytes in the map. Reasonable values for the highest resolution are 
> somewhere between 1648 and 5520, 3312 is often used.
> Example which should work with levels="0:24, 1:22, 2:20, 3:18, 4:16":
> --dem-dists=3312,13248,26512,53024
> This was found in a Garmin Demo map for transalpin data created 2009.
>
> There are only 4 values for –dem-dist ,although there are 5 „Levels“.
> This seems to be  in contrast to „…for gps devies you need one for each 
> resolution given with the --levels Option ?
>
> Regards
>
> Andreas
>
> Gesendet von Mail<https://go.microsoft.com/fwlink/?LinkId=550986> für Windows 
> 10
>
> Von: Henning Scholland<mailto:[email protected]>
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 11. Januar 2018 12:55
> An: [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>
> Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] option --show-profiles and DEM
>
>
> Hi all,
>
> I don't see a reason to have this option at all. It should be set
> automatically to 1 if either contour data or DEM is written. If this
> data is in the map, you always want to have it and if those are not in
> the map, you don't need it. Or am I wrong?
>
> Henning
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

Reply via email to