Hi Ticker
So, the first question is, does anyone know why 0x28 was given it's own group.
I've no idea why, but that is the way it is as far as I could determine.
The second problem is that the code that builds up the group start indexes into Mdr10 for Mdr9 assumes that the type ranges of the POI allocated for a group are in the same order as the groups, so, if you actually have a POI of type 0x28 then, because it has a lower type but a higher group than the 0x2a..30 range/groups, mdr9 is wrong.
I don't see where that happens but that would be wrong and mdr9 should be ordered by group. Cheers Steve _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
