Hi I compiled europe.osm.pdf with r4600 and did not encounter any errors. + Merged DEM from Freizeitkarte + Contourlines + Routing 1884 IMG files, 15.8Gb an Overviewmap of 29.684 kB and the index is 757Mb
Thanks a lot Gr Joris Met vriendelijke groeten, Joris Bo jori...@hotmail.com -----Oorspronkelijk bericht----- Van: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> Namens Gerd Petermann Verzonden: dinsdag 26 januari 2021 18:37 Aan: Development list for mkgmap <mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> Onderwerp: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Tiles pruned in DEM map Hi Carlos, I assume you meant 4.5 MB. I am not sure about the limits, is it 16MB for a single sub file (RGN, DEM etc) or 16MB for one *.img? Gerd ________________________________________ Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Carlos Dávila <car...@alternativaslibres.org> Gesendet: Dienstag, 26. Januar 2021 15:52 An: Development list for mkgmap Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Tiles pruned in DEM map I have compiled Australia with mkgmap r4600, with dem and without --no-order-by-decreasing-area at the end of command line and all tiles seem to display correctly. Overview size is 4.5 GB. What size is expected to cause trouble? El 24/1/21 a las 8:59, Gerd Petermann escribió: > Hi Ticker, > > my concern was not about the number of additional bytes on the disk, but the > size limits in IMG format. Anyway, since nobody else commented we probably > only find out when someone hits that limit, so I've committed the patch > (first v5, than changes from v6, sorry for that) with r4599. > > Gerd > > ________________________________________ > Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag > von Ticker Berkin <rwb-mkg...@jagit.co.uk> > Gesendet: Samstag, 23. Januar 2021 19:54 > An: Development list for mkgmap > Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] Tiles pruned in DEM map > > Hi Gerd > > Given that the overview map is for use on computers with 100s of G of > disk space and the main map will be a G or so, can an extra few 10K or > so in the overview map really be a problem for anyone? > > Building British-and-ireland, with default style and just --gmapsupp > (ie no index or routing) gmapsupp.img is 542M and osmmap.img is 220k. > With --order-by-decreasing-area they increase to 603M (11.3%) and 228k > (3.6%). > > With routing, indexing, code page 1252 and other typical options, > gmapsupp.imp might be double the size and so the percentage increase > would be a lot less but not significantly different for osmmap.img. > > Ticker > > On Sat, 2021-01-23 at 11:29 +0000, Gerd Petermann wrote: >> Hi Ticker, >> >> outch, sorry! It seems I created my patch without any testing :( I'm >> still not happy with the handling of the --order-by-decreasing -area >> option. I wonder why nobody else comments on this. Either nobody >> cares about the size of the overview map or nobody else tried any of >> the patches. Since this is a major change I hoped for more feedback. >> >> Gerd > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev > _______________________________________________ > mkgmap-dev mailing list > mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk > http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev _______________________________________________ mkgmap-dev mailing list mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
