Hi Gerd,

If I understand correctly...
For me searching the roadname really matching the addr:streetname would make 
the most sense even if it is not the closest way.
The closest way could be divided from the address by a 'river' or 
'fence/hedge/barrier' anyway?

As far as i understand it only happens in odd situations. So using the first 
highway segment that matches the name is a solution to me.

Kind regards
Joris


Met vriendelijke groeten,

Joris Bo
jori...@hotmail.com

-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> Namens Gerd Petermann
Verzonden: zaterdag 27 februari 2021 10:44
Aan: Development list for mkgmap <mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk>
Onderwerp: Re: [mkgmap-dev] internal error: found no housenumber road

Hi all,

I've uploaded a file with the problematic area: 
http://files.mkgmap.org.uk/detail/501
I see no obvious error in the housenumber data, all looks plausible, only some 
building=yes tags on nodes are probably wrong, but that isn't a problem here.

I really wonder what result I want to get from this data. There are two 
addr:interpolation=odd ways along the footway 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/775843679, so I think mkgmap should produce 
data so that the address for e.g. the node 
https://www.openstreetmap.org/node/1025525702
addr:housenumber=477
addr:street=Royal Parade
is found on that footway, as well as the interpolated numbers 459 ... 477 and 
many more numbers which belong to "Royal Parade", even though the footway has 
no name and is not connected to "Royal Parade" but to "Ievers Street".

The alternative would be to use https://www.openstreetmap.org/way/573320541 as 
it has the right name, but it is not as close. All the other highways named 
"Royal Parade" should be dismissed (which isn't easy to compute) because way 
573320541 is also split into fragments because of the --link-pois-to-ways 
processing.

So, as so often with house numbers we have a lot of correct information and the 
heuristic in mkgmap should find out that footway belongs to "Royal Parade", but 
that doesn't work. The "internal error" is produced because node 1025525702 
appears in two addr:interpolation intervals. The program tries to find a single 
road to use for the interpolation and that goes wrong here. The details are too 
complex to explain here. In short the data is "corrected" too often.

The failing code exists to avoid cases were a single, obviously wrong 
addr:interpolation way would generate lots of wrong address nodes. IIRC  I 
added it to detect nonsense in the imports of Canvec data (Canada). I have to 
find out if this code is still needed and if yes, how to improve the heuristic 
to avoid the internal error.

 Gerd

________________________________________
Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Gerd 
Petermann <gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com>
Gesendet: Freitag, 26. Februar 2021 20:11
An: Development list for mkgmap
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] internal error: found no housenumber road

Hi Carlos,

yes, it requires the footway, probably also other roads and a special order in 
the addr:interpolation way and maybe more. I found a possible fix but I need 
more time to understand in what case this will cause problems.
The map is usable, a few house numbers may not be found.

Gerd

________________________________________
Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag von Carlos 
Dávila <car...@alternativaslibres.org>
Gesendet: Freitag, 26. Februar 2021 20:06
An: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] internal error: found no housenumber road

Thanks for investigating it. I've been using those two rules for several years, 
it's strange the problem didn't arise till now.

El 26/2/21 a las 15:36, Gerd Petermann escribió:
> Hi Carlos,
>
>
> I didn't find a fix for the problem so far. I see what's going wrong but not 
> why it only happens in this special situation.
> Your points file contains these two rules:
> highway=traffic_signals { add mkgmap:road-speed = '-1'; add 
> mkgmap:road-speed-min = '1' } highway=crossing { add mkgmap:road-speed 
> = '-1'; add mkgmap:road-speed-min = '1' }
>
> When I copy them to the default style I see the same error. Because of the 
> extra rules and --link-poi-to-ways the OSM way 573320541 is split into 
> smaller parts and somehow mkgmap fails to find the right part for the numbers 
> generated by the addr:interpolation way.
>
> Gerd
>
> ________________________________________
> Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag 
> von Gerd Petermann <gpetermann_muenc...@hotmail.com>
> Gesendet: Freitag, 26. Februar 2021 08:00
> An: Development list for mkgmap
> Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] internal error: found no housenumber road
>
> Hi Carlos,
>
> OK, I can now reproduce with
> java -Xmx4G -ea -jar d:\mkgmap\dist\mkgmap.jar --route --housenumbers  
> --link-pois-to-ways  --style-option=language=non_latin 
> --style-file=..\mio 51690125.o5m
>
> Also with a smaller extract. It seems your style in combination with 
> --link-pois-to-ways triggers this...
>
> Gerd
>
> ________________________________________
> Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag 
> von Carlos Dávila <car...@alternativaslibres.org>
> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2021 23:06
> An: mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> Betreff: Re: [mkgmap-dev] internal error: found no housenumber road
>
> Removing --road-name-config didn't fix the problem. Error can be 
> reproduced with command:
>
> java -Xmx27G -ea -jar mkgmap.jar -c opciones_comunes -c 
> opciones_teselas
> --latin1 --family-id=51169 --overview-mapname=OCE1169
> --overview-mapnumber=51169000 --name-tag-list=int_name,name:en,name
> --report-similar-arcs --report-dead-ends=2 --drive-on=detect,right 
> --check-roundabouts --check-roundabout-flares 
> --license-file=license_OSM --copyright-file=copyright  
> --style-option=language=non_latin --style=mio 51690125.o5m
>
> You can get all (I hope) needed files at 
> https://alternativaslibres.org/tmp/no_housenumber.zip
>
> El 25/2/21 a las 22:34, Carlos Dávila escribió:
>> According to your comment, I think it may be caused by the line below 
>> passed by  --road-name-config parameter. Testing now...
>>
>> suffix:en = " Avenue", " Close", " Court", " Crescent", " Drive", "
>> Gate", " Grove", " Lane", " Mews", " Parade", " Place", " Road", "
>> Square", " Street", " Terrace", " View", " Way"
>>
>>
>> El 25/2/21 a las 20:53, Gerd Petermann escribió:
>>> Hi Carlos,
>>>
>>> I cannot reproduce this with the default style. The error message 
>>> means that mkgmap found a matching road at some time and later it 
>>> didn't. This should not happen, but maybe it depends on the style or 
>>> other options. I downloaded the small area and tried with java -jar 
>>> dist\mkgmap.jar --bounds=bounds.zip --route --housenumbers --index 
>>> d:\OSM\addr-inter.osm
>>>
>>> Please let me know how to reproduce.
>>>
>>> Gerd
>>>
>>>
>>> ________________________________________
>>> Von: mkgmap-dev <mkgmap-dev-boun...@lists.mkgmap.org.uk> im Auftrag 
>>> von Carlos Dávila <car...@alternativaslibres.org>
>>> Gesendet: Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2021 20:33
>>> An: Development list for mkgmap
>>> Betreff: [mkgmap-dev] internal error: found no housenumber road
>>>
>>> While processing Australia I get several warnings of the form:
>>>
>>> SEVERE (HousenumberGenerator): 51690125.o5m: internal error: found 
>>> no housenumber road for interpolated house
>>> http://www.openstreetmap.org/?mlat=-37.782001&mlon=144.959382&zoom=1
>>> 7
>>>
>>> Looking at that area in JOSM, I see addr:interpolation lines next to 
>>> a footway without a name, connecting houses with addr:street=Royal 
>>> Parede, and a primary road named Royal Parede some 20 m away from 
>>> the addr:interpolation lines. I guess mkgmap searches for street 
>>> name in the footway (which doesn't have a name) instead of in the 
>>> Royal Parade road, and thus it fails to assign housenumbers.
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>> mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
>>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>>> mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
>>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
>> _______________________________________________
>> mkgmap-dev mailing list
>> mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
>> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
> _______________________________________________
> mkgmap-dev mailing list
> mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
> http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev
_______________________________________________
mkgmap-dev mailing list
mkgmap-dev@lists.mkgmap.org.uk
http://www.mkgmap.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/mkgmap-dev

Reply via email to