For the sake of brevity, yes we should keep to the point.

Good call Philip...
Can we go ahead with the reply (or has it been already sent) ?

--
Raphael

On Nov 5, 2007 6:09 PM, Philip Serracino Inglott <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

> Hey, I was kinda busy this week, But I said I was gonna write something
> and send it to you then you share it on the list, defeats the anonymity a
> bit doesn't it. The point is that I don't want to publicly reply to some one
> with my same surname. This list is public, but the letter will 'formally' be
> sent out by someone else at least, I'm just lending in a hand.
>
> Now all the points made by raphel and ramon are good ones but the problem
> is that that's too many points. If we can keep it short, more people will
> read it (it's intended as a letter to editor not an article). If we get a
> counter-reply we can use the other points to reply back. alternatively, If
> we don't get a counter reply (particularly to the pointy last sentence) then
> not enough people took notice anyway. I feel more comfortable if kieth does
> the corrections, so it has a few authors.
>
> regarding the points:
> Raphel:
> well Megabyte is not a sponsor of the mirror, but they are our longest
> standing sponsors, so well ok.
> fr. Peter talks a lot about education, but the reply tries to focus on the
> OSL  idea, lets try and be focused (oss for educ can be a whole article)
> The last point also breaches a new subject, can it be made subtly?
>
> Ramon:
> 1. Point taken!
> 2. doh! but very briefly, someone will try it and reply to complain that
> its not good enough which will give us ammunition to demand more resources.
> (or someone will laud it graces no end, which is also good)
> 3. I disagree, It is our fault (as linux users) we are not reported
> enough, don't be like AN; do not bang your feet the media is not covering
> you, if anything do not do it through that very same media, do something
> worth covering, first. (at least that will probably be the editor's and
> readers POV)
>
> just me 2c, edit as you please otherwise.
>
> Philip
>
>
> On 30/10/2007, Keith Vassallo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > Well, I was not the one who wrote the article, but your suggestions are
> > very viable.
> >
> > I will wait for the person who wrote the article to submit any
> > corrections to me or the list (depending if they want to remain anonymous).
> > Failing that I'll update it myself.
> >
> > Keith
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: Ramon Casha <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Tue, 10/30/2007 9:15am
> > To: Malta Linux User Group - general list < [email protected]>
> > Subject: Re: [LINUX.ORG.MT] Draft of letetter to sunday times in
> > response to Fr. Peter's Article
> >
> > 1. You need a spelling/grammar checker. Can you send this as an ODT file
> > or something?
> > eg: "for an organisation who's->whose members", "then->than there might
> > be"
> > 2. Mention the Maltese spell checker, which is on the MLUG server and is
> > a service that MLUG provides for free in the interest of Malta.
> > 3. Mention that OSS is already widely used, but underreported, in the
> > Maltese IT industry.
> >
> >
> >
> > On 30/10/2007, Keith Vassallo < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Dear All,
> >
> > The following letter is being considered for publication in THE TIMES
> > following article by Peter Serracino Inglott. Please let me know what you
> > think before we send it off.
> >
> > On a slightly related note, the minutes of the AGM should be posted soon
> > by Anton (our new Secretary :) ) on this list and the MLUG website.
> >
> > Rgds,
> >
> > Keith
> > (PRO)
> >
> > Peter Serracino Inglotts' article "ICT is an election issue" (sunday
> > 28th october 2007) was rather refreshing to the Malta Linux Users Group
> > (MLUG). That a person who is considered by many Maltese an academic
> > 'elder' speaks so frankly about Open Source Software (OSS) is
> > revitalising for an organisation who's members often feel alienated by
> > young officials who seem oblivious to the global reality that is OSS.
> > MLUG particularly welcomes the idea of an "Open Source Laboratory" as a
> > public-private partnership partially funded through public funds. Yet,
> > MLUG feels it needs to point out that there are many more local
> > companies today, then there might be foreign members of SmartCity
> > tomorrow, that would benefit from such a lab. Malta is quickly becoming
> > a leader in providing IT offshore services and OSS is one of the many
> > means to foster innovation in this area as a community. To this effect
> > the MLUG, with the support of 2X and GO, already runs a mirror service
> > ( mirror.linux.org.mt) that anyone using Linux in Malta can benefit
> > from.
> > This contribution from our part, small as it might be, is the kind of
> > collaborative environment we want to build for our ICT industry. In
> > order to make "ICT as universally accessible as possible" a
> > collaborative approach is essential. OSS allows even the smallest player
> > to participate in this collaboration, and is therefore good for Malta's
> > emerging ICT industry. An ICT scenario dominated by very few
> > monopolistic big-players does not allow much space, or an equal footing
> > for, smaller players, and therefore, might not be the best strategy for
> > Malta. The MLUG, therefore, urges all ICT policy makers to, not only
> > heed Peter Serracino Inglott's advice about "doing more in order to
> > encourage Open Source", but to go further and make Open Source an
> > integral part of their ICT policy.
> > _______________________________________________
> > MLUG-list mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mailserv.megabyte.net/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ramon Casha _______________________________________________
> > MLUG-list mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mailserv.megabyte.net/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
> > _______________________________________________
> > MLUG-list mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > http://mailserv.megabyte.net/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
> >
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> MLUG-list mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mailserv.megabyte.net/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list
>
>
_______________________________________________
MLUG-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailserv.megabyte.net/mailman/listinfo/mlug-list

Reply via email to