I'd probably just call them "MLVM builds" but I'm concerned about the binary plugs. Unlike IcedTea I'm not filling in the blanks with GPL code.
- Charlie Chanwit Kaewkasi wrote: > Hello, > > Like IcedTea, is it possible just by releasing a build with the > different name (no JDK or Java in it)? > > Chanwit > > 2008/9/9 Charles Oliver Nutter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: >> I've got an OpenJDK build setup with MLVM stuff, and was wondering if >> there's any legal issues with me posting binaries somewhere? I can >> pretty easily set up a nightly build and push to one of my slices for >> download. I imagine others would appreciate not having to run the >> OpenJDK build setup gauntlet. >> >> Anyone know of any issues with doing so? >> >> FYI, my builds would be Linux i586 only. I don't grok Solaris yet. >> >> - Charlie >> _______________________________________________ >> mlvm-dev mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev >> > > > _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
