It does indeed. Am I reading this correctly that we will now(/soon) be able to create proxies for abstract classes?
On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 9:45 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter <[email protected]>wrote: > Well this one looks interesting. I'm generating several thousand such > abstract adapters; this would allow me to potentially use my same > abstract supertype for them all with either indy or non-indy backing > them up... > > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 7:35 AM, <[email protected]> wrote: > > Changeset: e2709716a4ea > > Author: jrose > > Date: 2010-05-18 00:35 -0700 > > URL: http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/jdk/rev/e2709716a4ea > > > > meth: add proxy maker for closures > > > > + meth-proxy-6953246.patch > > ! series > > > > _______________________________________________ > > mlvm-dev mailing list > > [email protected] > > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > mlvm-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev >
_______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
