Thanks Steve I am using your builds as well and appreciate the effort
mark roos [email protected] wrote on 01/11/2011 07:29:02 PM: > From: > > Stephen Bannasch <[email protected]> > > To: > > Da Vinci Machine Project <[email protected]> > > Date: > > 01/11/2011 07:29 PM > > Subject: > > another mac build available > > Sent by: > > [email protected] > > Howard Lovatt was interested in another build for the Mac and now > I've got one that actually passes the five test suites in > jdk/test/java/dyn. > > http://www.concord.org/~sbannasch/mlvm/java-1.7.0-internal- > mlvm-2011_01_11.tar.gz > > This was built with the following guards: "buildable testable /coro" > > ... and with fastdebug enabled if I've got the confusing env vars > set correctly: > > DEBUG_NAME=fastdebug > SKIP_FASTDEBUG_BUILD=true > > The only thing I am certain of is that it prints it's version and > passes these tests: > > $ jtreg -jdk:build/bsd-amd64/j2sdk-image -v:summary jdk/test/java/dyn > Passed: java/dyn/ClassValueTest.java > Passed: java/dyn/InvokeDynamicPrintArgs.java > Passed: java/dyn/InvokeGenericTest.java > Passed: java/dyn/JavaDocExamplesTest.java > Passed: java/dyn/MethodHandlesTest.java > > FYI: My build scripts are updated here: https://gist.github.com/gists/243072 > > It would be nice at some point to integrate these build scripts with > the new work on the macosx-port to create an universal (32 > and 64bit) MLVM image that played nice with the tools and systems > Apple uses to switch between different JVM instances on Mac > OS X. > > http://wikis.sun.com/display/OpenJDK/Mac+OS+X+Port > > They are also using llvm-gcc-4.2 and I wonder if it compiles to faster code? > > I'm using gcc-4.0 in my build scripts. > > _______________________________________________ > mlvm-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
_______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
