> > My question had to do with run time overhead. Do you think that > invokeGeneric > is slower than invokeEaxct at run time? If not then that removes one of the > reasons for not using java classes.
Hi Mark, The current invokeGeneric argument conversion implementation has poor performance profile. In jdk7 b124 invokeGeneric() can be 50 times or more slower than invokeExact() or invokeGeneric() with exactly matching signature. As far as I know, John hopes to address this problem before JDK7 FCS. Best regards, Kirill _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
