At 7:52 PM -0700 3/24/11, John Rose wrote: >On Mar 24, 2011, at 11:24 AM, Stephen Bannasch wrote: > >> At 2:36 AM -0700 3/23/11, John Rose wrote: >>> With the renaming going on, the code is changing rapidly. But I think we >>> are converging. Please let me know what happens with the next build. >> >> Today the build completes fine but I still only get one java/lang/invoke >> test passing. >> >> FAILED: java/lang/invoke/6987555/Test6987555.java >> FAILED: java/lang/invoke/6991596/Test6991596.java >> Passed: java/lang/invoke/ClassValueTest.java >> FAILED: java/lang/invoke/InvokeDynamicPrintArgs.java >> FAILED: java/lang/invoke/InvokeGenericTest.java >> FAILED: java/lang/invoke/JavaDocExamplesTest.java >> FAILED: java/lang/invoke/MethodHandlesTest.java >> FAILED: java/lang/invoke/MethodTypeTest.java >> Test results: passed: 1; failed: 7 >> >> Some folks have been interested in having me generate an updated mlvm build. >> >> I've been waiting for these tests to pass before uploading a new build. >> >> In effect I am using passing the java/lang/invoke tests as a proxy for >> determining whether a build is worth sharing. Is this too strict a proxy? > >No, that's not too strict. It is the test I use for pushing a patch to mlvm. >There's something different about yourbuild and mine.
If you use a build script can you post a copy to gist or some other location. I use update.sh which is one of the documents in this gist: https://gist.github.com/243072 _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list [email protected] http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
