I am ready to make the change myself, go for it. Where will the anonymousClassLoader end up?
mark From: John Rose <john.r.r...@oracle.com> To: Da Vinci Machine Project <mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net> Date: 03/28/2011 01:03 PM Subject: the fate of java.dyn Sent by: mlvm-dev-boun...@openjdk.java.net OpenJDK b135 has JVM support for the new package name java.dyn.invoke, and therefore the new API names can be used with a b135 JVM plus a suitable -Xbootclasspath patch. In b136 or b137 the JDK changes will follow, so it will work "out of the box". Here's my question: Does anybody care if we delete JVM support for java.dyn in the very next OpenJDK build? That's what we'd prefer to do. -- John _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
_______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
