At 6:05 PM -0500 5/15/11, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
>Ok, nevermind...looks like it wasn't applied by Stephen's
>script...perhaps it's not marked as ready yet?
>
>I will be patient :)
>
>- Charlie
>
>On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 11:27 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter
><head...@headius.com> wrote:
>> I think I updated correctly, but still seem to run into the
>> catchException issue...attempting to confirm now.
>>
>> On Sun, May 15, 2011 at 4:11 AM,  <john.r.r...@oracle.com> wrote:
>>> Changeset: 2cd2529d803f
>>> Author:    jrose
>>> Date:      2011-05-15 02:10 -0700
> >> URL:       http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/jdk/rev/2cd2529d803f
>>>
>>> meth: adjust API, small bug fixes
>>>
>>> + meth-args-6983728.patch
>>> ! meth-doc-7014005.patch
>>> + meth-exc-7044892.patch
>>> ! meth-review-7032323.patch
> >> ! series



It looks like both meth-args-6983728 and meth-exc-7044892 in that changeset are 
being applied to the jdk.

This is from my build console log:

  + (cd sources/jdk; hg qpush -a)
  (working directory not at a head)
  applying meth-ing-7034977.patch
  applying meth-conv-6939861.patch
  applying meth-args-6983728.patch
  applying meth-review-7032323.patch
  applying meth-doc-7014005.patch
  applying meth-exc-7044892.patch
  applying meth-review-7032323.patch
  applying meth-doc-7014005.patch
  ...
_______________________________________________
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev

Reply via email to