Ok, I'll reinvestigate; I thought I had logged that it was compiling
but perhaps that wasn't with the new property...

On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Tom Rodriguez <[email protected]> wrote:
> I'm seeing slow perf as well but I think it might be a jruby/292 mismatch 
> problem:
>
> Exception <a 'java/lang/NoSuchMethodError'>: 
> java.lang.invoke.MethodHandles.convertArguments(Ljava/lang/invoke/MethodHandle;Ljava/lang/invoke/MethodT\
> ype;)Ljava/lang/invoke/MethodHandle; (0xefdd4b18 )
> thrown 
> [/net/smite.us.oracle.com/export/ws/bim/src/share/vm/interpreter/linkResolver.cpp,
>  line 354]
> for thread 0x0807c800
> Exception <a 'java/lang/NoSuchMethodError'> (0xefdd4b18)
>  thrown in interpreter method <{method} '<clinit>' '()V' in 
> 'org/jruby/runtime/invokedynamic/InvokeDynamicSupport'>
>  at bci 2876 for thread 0x0807c800
> Exception <a 'java/lang/NoSuchMethodError'> (0xefdd4b18 )
>
> which results in this:
>
> Exception <a 'java/lang/NoSuchMethodError'> (0xefdd4b18)
>  thrown in interpreter method <{method} 'tryCompile' 
> '(Lorg/jruby/ast/Node;Ljava/lang/String;Lorg/jruby/util/JRubyClassLoader;Lorg>
>  at bci 56 for thread 0x0807c800
> Exception <a 'java/lang/NoClassDefFoundError'>: Could not initialize class 
> org.jruby.compiler.impl.StandardASMCompiler (0xefe4c818 )
> thrown 
> [/net/smite.us.oracle.com/export/ws/bim/src/share/vm/oops/instanceKlass.cpp, 
> line 440]
> for thread 0x0807c800
> Exception <a 'java/lang/NoClassDefFoundError'> (0xefe4c818)
>  thrown in interpreter method <{method} '<init>' 
> '(Ljava/lang/String;Ljava/lang/String;Lorg/jruby/Ruby;Lorg/jruby/internal/runtime>
>  at bci 126 for thread 0x0807c800
> Exception <a 'java/lang/NoClassDefFoundError'> (0xefe4c818)
>  thrown in interpreter method <{method} 'jitThresholdReached' 
> '(Lorg/jruby/internal/runtime/methods/DefaultMethod;Lorg/jruby/RubyI>
>  at bci 220 for thread 0x0807c800
>
> So I think the jruby compiler never triggers with the new meth.jar.
>
> tom
>
> On May 31, 2011, at 12:03 PM, John Rose wrote:
>
>> On May 31, 2011, at 9:36 AM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote:
>>
>>> If you mean java.lang.invoke.GWT_FORCE_RICOCHET_FRAMES=true, then I
>>> have more bad news...it's even slower :(
>>
>> Is that with meth-bim.patch applied?  That is Tom's first cut at an 
>> optimization for RFs.
>>
>> -- John
>> _______________________________________________
>> mlvm-dev mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
>
> _______________________________________________
> mlvm-dev mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
>
_______________________________________________
mlvm-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev

Reply via email to