On 09/07/2011 09:32 PM, Per Bothner wrote: > On 09/07/2011 02:15 AM, Rémi Forax wrote: >> This remember me that we don't have any benchmarks using dynamic languages >> which is, as you explain, not good on the long term. >> >> What about having 10 to 12 benchs, one by language, provided by each >> language runtime developer >> as a good bench for their runtime ? > Well, there are the Computer Language Benchmark Game problems at > http://shootout.alioth.debian.org/ . Isaac Gouy doesn't want to support > more languages officially, but we can certainly use these as a starting > point on some alternative server. > > (There are fast Kawa versions of all the current benchmarks: > http://per.bothner.com/blog/2010/Kawa-in-shootout/ )
The shootout benchmark compares languages/runtimes, I want to compare JVMs or versions of JVMs running idiomatic code of each dynamic languages. Rémi _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
