On 10/10/2011 08:58 PM, Charles Oliver Nutter wrote: > I agree it would be an interesting language on the JVM. It may be the > "dynamic Java" I've wanted to make for a long time, with the added > bonus of optional static types. > > This could almost be a weekend project atop invokedynamic.
The type system is not that simple if you want to avoid to do one cast for each assignation (and for each method call arguments). I think you need one supplementary day :) > - Charlie Rémi _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
