On Jan 6, 2012, at 4:57 AM, Jochen Theodorou wrote:
> I see where it comes from, but "reusing" that instead of making a new if
> is not really needed, is it?
>
> Do people here agree this should be improved?
The javadoc for this throw is:
* @throws IllegalArgumentException if the target does not have a
* leading parameter type that is a reference type
Therefore, I suppose the message could be, "The target does not have a leading
parameter type that is a reference type".
The current message is supposed to be an abbreviation of that sentence.
Perhaps it is excessively optimized for space.
-- John_______________________________________________
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
