On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Rémi Forax <fo...@univ-mlv.fr> wrote:
> It can be an escape analysis change.
> As far as I know, escape analysis don't work through indy call but
> if Charles see same performance as Java, escape analysis has to work ??

My comment was about using an iterator/cursor for iteration (no object
creation visible to Ruby) rather than numeric indices (Fixnum created
per iteration). When object overhead is equivalent between Ruby and
Java we can match perf.

- Charlie
_______________________________________________
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev

Reply via email to