On Thu, Feb 2, 2012 at 4:47 AM, Rémi Forax <fo...@univ-mlv.fr> wrote: > It can be an escape analysis change. > As far as I know, escape analysis don't work through indy call but > if Charles see same performance as Java, escape analysis has to work ??
My comment was about using an iterator/cursor for iteration (no object creation visible to Ruby) rather than numeric indices (Fixnum created per iteration). When object overhead is equivalent between Ruby and Java we can match perf. - Charlie _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev