On May 1, 2012, at 2:38 PM, Rémi Forax wrote:

> On 05/01/2012 09:24 PM, christian.thalin...@oracle.com wrote:
>> Changeset: 5ec0f6472b4b
>> Author:    twisti
>> Date:      2012-05-01 12:24 -0700
>> URL:       http://hg.openjdk.java.net/mlvm/mlvm/jdk/rev/5ec0f6472b4b
>> 
>> meth-lazy: moved to ASM for bytecode generation
>> 
>> ! meth-lazy-7023639.patch
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> mlvm-dev mailing list
>> mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
> 
> Hi Christian,
> in emitIconstInsn, you forget ICONST_M1, also

We don't need M1 :-)

> ICONST_M1, ICONST_0, ICONST_1, etc are subsequent values so
> you can write:
> switch(i) {
> case -1:
> case 0:
> case 1:
> case 2:
> case 3:
> case 4:
> case 5:
>   opcode = Opcodes.ICONST_0 + i;
> ...
> }

I could do that, right.

> 
> for emitLoadInsn, emitStoreInsn and emitReturnType, you can use
> the same switch that map 'I', 'J', 'F', 'D', 'A', 'V' to 0...5,
> because ISTORE, ILOAD and IRETURN variants are all in the same order.
> 
> Also nextEIID and nextNFID can use an AtomicInter and its method 
> getAndIncrement
> instead of a synchronized method, it should be more efficient.

These were supposed to be debugging only since the anonymous class loader 
defines each class uniquely anyway.  Not sure if we keep them or not.

-- Chris

> 
> cheers,
> Rémi
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> mlvm-dev mailing list
> mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev

_______________________________________________
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev

Reply via email to