On Dec 12, 2012, at 9:35 AM, "MacGregor, Duncan (GE Energy Management)" <duncan.macgre...@ge.com> wrote:
> I do see the failure with 8 as well. That helps. I can't recall code that has a "8 argument limitation" and does something else with 9+. Maybe John has an idea. -- Chris > > On 12/12/2012 17:31, "Christian Thalinger" > <christian.thalin...@oracle.com> wrote: > >> Do you see the same failure with 8 (to rule out differences between 7u12 >> and 8)? >> >> -- Chris >> >> On Dec 12, 2012, at 7:12 AM, "MacGregor, Duncan (GE Energy Management)" >> <duncan.macgre...@ge.com> wrote: >> >>> Finally got time to try running our full application under 7u12 and >>> I've hit a problem with our database library. In two cases where we are >>> combining method handles to catch exceptions from a library method, >>> process those exceptions to fill in our own error information and then >>> fallback to the proper error handling code, we are failing to be bind >>> properly. The failure occurs with methods with 9 or more arguments where >>> the last one is an array. >>> >>> I've attached a minimal test case which works under update 10 but fails >>> under update 12 (all tests on Windows x64) and shows the difference in >>> behaviour with the number of args. >>> <MethodHandleBug.java> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> mlvm-dev mailing list >>> mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net >>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev >> _______________________________________________ >> mlvm-dev mailing list >> mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net >> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev > > _______________________________________________ > mlvm-dev mailing list > mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
