Hi all,

Many apologies for the late notice but we've cancelled this one for 2014.
There were simply too many scheduling conflicts and FOSDEM will serve us
well enough for a majority of these discussions.

Cheers,
Martijn


On 22 October 2013 20:33, Francis ANDRE <francis.andre.kampb...@orange.fr>wrote:

>  Martijn
>
> I would like to make a small presentation about the requirements & ideas
> for extending  the JVM to support a  per formant enterprise  COBOL runtime.
> I already exchange some views long time ago with John Rose but without
> success (I mean, I did not succeed in convincing him about the needed
> extensions.) This should take about 1/2 hour.
>
> May be it would be interesting for all JVM guys to know the problems
> around Cobol, one of the major langage in the computing industry compared
> to the JVM
>
>
> Francis
>
> Le 22/10/2013 09:19, Martijn Verburg a écrit :
>
> Hi all,
>
>  We're working on this (getting a venue etc). I think the focus is likely
> to be narrowed to have some presentations/discussions and workshops on Java
> 9 (10?) related topics. In particular Jigsaw, Type Reification (or not),
> and Value Types/Tuples/Packed Objects/Structs/Whatever you want to call
> them.
>
>
>
>
> Cheers,
> Martijn
>
>
> On 21 October 2013 20:10, Francis ANDRE 
> <francis.andre.kampb...@orange.fr>wrote:
>
>>  Hi Martijn
>>
>> I am interested by the JVM Summit in Europe. How can I join the process?
>>
>> Francis
>> Le 02/10/2013 14:38, Martijn Verburg a écrit :
>>
>>  Hi all,
>>
>>  Hope this is the right mailing list to post on, apologies for the
>> slight OT post.
>>
>>  A few people asked whether the LJC could/would host a JVM language
>> summit in Europe which would hopefully cover the EMEA based folks that
>> can't make the existing summit.
>>
>>  I'd like to get an idea of whether there's appetite for this and if so
>> when it should be run:
>>
>>  * At the same time and have some video-conferencing sessions? OR
>>  * At a time almost 'opposite' to the existing summit so that there's a
>> summit roughly every 6-months.
>>
>>  Ping me directly with your thoughts (unless this is the right mailing
>> list - in that case reply back here).
>>
>> Cheers,
>> Martijn
>>
>>
>>   _______________________________________________
>> mlvm-dev mailing 
>> listmlvm-...@openjdk.java.nethttp://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> mlvm-dev mailing list
>> mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
>> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
>>
>>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> mlvm-dev mailing list
> mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
>
>
_______________________________________________
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev

Reply via email to