Looks good.
Best regards,
Vladimir Ivanov
On 9/12/14, 7:03 PM, Igor Ignatyev wrote:
Vladimir/Alan,
Yes, only WB.fullGC() is needed, I replaced it w/ System.gc() and
removed whitebox from the changes.
updated webrev :
http://cr.openjdk.java.net/~iignatyev/kshefov/8057707/webrev.00/
Thanks
Igor
On 09/12/2014 05:41 PM, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
Alan,
I wasn't aware about such capability. Sounds interesting.
Since we are short on time integrating tests for JEP210 into 9 and 8u40,
I'd suggest to remove dependency on WB API from the tests for now and
file a followup bug to restore it once a suitable solution is found. As
I understand, only WB.fullGC() is needed. It can be replaced with
System.gc() call.
Best regards,
Vladimir Ivanov
On 9/12/14, 11:55 AM, Alan Bateman wrote:
On 11/09/2014 17:33, Vladimir Ivanov wrote:
Looks ok.
I don't like the idea of having 2 copies of WB API for hotspot and jdk.
But that's tolerable unless we have shared location for test libraries
in top repository. Having reliable tests is more important IMO.
Has there been any thought put in to use the jtreg's multi-root
capability? For some time it has been possible to run subsets of jdk and
hotspot tests with a single jtreg command. I don't know if it helps here
but it would be good to avoid having to duplicate the code.
-Alan
_______________________________________________
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
_______________________________________________
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
