Remi, I tried to reproduce your problem with jdk9 b44. It runs decently fast.
When did it start to regress?
Regards
Marcus
> On 30 Dec 2014, at 20:48, Remi Forax <fo...@univ-mlv.fr> wrote:
>
> Hi guys,
> I've found a bug in the interaction between the lambda form and inlining
> algorithm,
> basically if the inlining heuristic bailout because the method is recursive
> and already inlined once,
> instead to emit a code to do a direct call, it revert to do call to
> linkStatic with the method
> as MemberName.
>
> I think it's a regression because before the introduction of lambda forms,
> I'm pretty sure that the JIT was emitting a direct call.
>
> Step to reproduce with nashorn, run this JavaScript code
> function fibo(n) {
> return (n < 2)? 1: fibo(n - 1) + fibo(n - 2)
> }
>
> print(fibo(45))
>
> like this:
> /usr/jdk/jdk1.9.0/bin/jjs -J-XX:+UnlockDiagnosticVMOptions
> -J-XX:+PrintAssembly fibo.js > log.txt
>
> look for a method 'fibo' from the tail of the log, you will find something
> like this:
>
> 0x00007f97e4b4743f: mov $0x76d08f770,%r8 ; {oop(a
> 'java/lang/invoke/MemberName' = {method} {0x00007f97dcff8e40} 'fibo'
> '(Ljdk/nashorn/internal/runtime/ScriptFunction;Ljava/lang/Object;I)I' in
> 'jdk/nashorn/internal/scripts/Script$Recompilation$2$fibo')}
> 0x00007f97e4b47449: xchg %ax,%ax
> 0x00007f97e4b4744b: callq 0x00007f97dd0446e0
>
> I hope this can be fixed. My demonstration that I can have fibo written with
> a dynamic language
> that run as fast as written in Java doesn't work anymore :(
>
> cheers,
> Rémi
>
> _______________________________________________
> mlvm-dev mailing list
> mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
> http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
_______________________________________________
mlvm-dev mailing list
mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net
http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
