OK - I'm going to bite. Why are we doing this? If we're shipping a general purpose bytecode manipulation library, then why is it private?
Surely this should become an official, supported & public API? On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 7:58 PM, Remi Forax <fo...@univ-mlv.fr> wrote: > > On 02/17/2015 08:30 PM, Mark Roos wrote: > > I see that jdk8 now includes a copy of ASM (jdk.internal.org.objectweb.asm). > > Is it recommended to use that instance vs suppling a copy with my > application? > > thanks > mark > > > Hi Mark, > > These classes are not the one you are looking for :) > > As the 'internal' in the package name suggest, these classes are intended to > be used by the JDK classes only, and not by anyone else. > BTW, these classes are not visible anymore in jdk9 (even by reflection). > > regards, > Rémi > > > _______________________________________________ > mlvm-dev mailing list > mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev > _______________________________________________ mlvm-dev mailing list mlvm-dev@openjdk.java.net http://mail.openjdk.java.net/mailman/listinfo/mlvm-dev
