[2016-09-10 15:22] Philipp Takacs <phil...@bureaucracy.de> > [2016-09-09 09:35] Link Satonaka <link.saton...@outlook.com> > > > > Maybe there are more differences in terms of attachment > > storage, but the differences are very slight. > > The files should be the same. MH and Maildir store every mail as is and > one file per mail.
The files *are* the same. DJB took MH as the basis and only changed what was necessary to solve the locking problem. > MH is MRA compatible, but sadly there are only a few MRA with support MH. I don't understand this statement, but maybe my knowledge of actual implementations is too small. In theory, MRAs *retrieve* mail, which they then pass to an MDA for *delivery* (possibly via the local MTA). This at least is what fetchmail does (very well). I assume that any MDA will be able to deliver to a command. Procmail, which we probably all use anyway, is able to do so. This, for instance, is from my procmailrc: :0 w :.lock * ^List-ID: <mmh.marmaro.de> | /usr/local/mmh/bin/rcvstore +l/mmh ... and -- voila -- I have MH support for message retrieval. Syncing mail via IMAP is something different; it has nothing to do with MRAs. > If you want other solutions to this problem you could write was is your > current setup and what are your requirements. Maybe we find a better > solution for you. I much appreciate this approach to the problem! Thanks, Philipp. meillo