Hi Peter, What type of internet connection are you using for this benchmarking? I know that some people probably have much worse connections than you (dial-up), for them compression might help considerably.
Nice work! 90s down to 4s is a lot. Cheers, Jason On Thu, Mar 18, 2010 at 10:24 AM, Peter Bienstman <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi, > > The last few weeks I've been having a lot of fun trying to optimise the > sync > protocol. > > I started from what I would call a typical daily sync scenario: doing 200 > reps > on my 2.5y old Windows Mobile phone, adding 20 new cards on my desktop > machine, and then syncing these two over my home WLAN. > > It was quite an interesting experience, and I learned many things about > html > and tcp/ip in the process :-) > > Anyhow, the upshot is that I managed to get the time to do this down from > 90 > sec to under 4 seconds, which I think is pretty nice. > > Interestingly, about 1.5 sec of this seems to be html overhead. I don't see > an > easy way to get rid of this, but if somebody wants to try, feel free. Four > seconds however should be plenty fast enough to be comfortable :-) > > I've also experimented with compression, but that seemed to increase the > transfer time slightly. > > Cheers, > > Peter > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > . > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected]<mnemosyne-proj-users%[email protected]> > . > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en. > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "mnemosyne-proj-users" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/mnemosyne-proj-users?hl=en.
